Your Right to Know: Strike a balance on student privacy


In recent years, public schools in Wisconsin and across the country have come under intense scrutiny. At issue are some of the most politically engaging, high-stakes issues of our time: what we teach children about race, gender and identity; how we police the line between free speech and anti-discrimination law; and the role of parents in shaping their children’s worldview. 

Elisabeth Lambert

These are political questions, but they are also highly personal, reaching into the most intimate details of children’s and families’ lives.

That puts schools in a significant bind. On the one hand, the public has a right to know how public schools act, meaning that schools have a duty to be transparent. On the other hand, students have special rights to privacy enshrined in both state and federal law. How do schools balance the transparency they owe the public with the confidentiality they owe their students?

Schools across Wisconsin are approaching these challenges in wildly different ways — some reasonable, others nonsensical and legally insupportable. In my work as an attorney representing students and families in school matters, I’ve encountered a grab bag. 

For example, at one extreme, I recently filed a public records request asking a school district to provide records showing the district’s disciplinary response to incidents in which students used racial slurs. Essentially, I was asking the district to search its disciplinary record-keeping system for incidents coded as involving racial harassment (about 50 for the requested time period, I believe), redact any information that could identify individual pupils, and provide a document showing the school’s response (detention, suspension, counseling, etc.) in each case. The district refused to provide those records, claiming it would violate student privacy.

At the other extreme, I have represented parents whose children’s highly sensitive information has been made public through open records requests. The recurring pattern goes something like this:

A parent emails a school administrator highly sensitive information — for example, asking that a child be barred from accessing library books with sexual content, or notifying the school that the child is navigating issues related to gender identity. Another community member (often politically motivated) files an open record request asking for all emails to the district addressing issues of library book access or student gender identity. The school then releases the highly sensitive email — sometimes with no redactions, other times just deleting the child’s name but leaving in enough detail to easily discern which student it applies to.

These examples are extreme, but they’re also not uncommon. They speak to the lack of coherent understanding in Wisconsin of how school district transparency can be reconciled with student privacy. 

Fortunately, there is a workable solution. Under federal law, schools are prohibited from releasing “personally identifiable information” about students. That means that schools can share records, data and information with the public, so long as they make sure to redact any language or details that can be tied to an individual student. 

Wisconsin school districts that diverge from this practice standard claim to be acting based on differences between the federal and state student privacy laws. But the federal approach strikes the right balance. It would, for instance, allow districts to redact identifying information from the racial harassment disciplinary records while showing what (if any) discipline was applied.

This shared understanding of the requirements of state student privacy laws will restore consistency between school districts, ensure that sensitive information regarding individual students is kept confidential, and give communities the big-picture information they need to understand what’s happening in their schools.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (, a group dedicated to open government. Elisabeth Lambert is the founder and principal of the Wisconsin Education Law and Policy Hub (

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: Public education underfunded

    September 21st, 2023

    Wisconsin’s Joint Finance Committee considers all bills introduced in either house of the legislature for the appropriation of money for all state funded programs. “These bills shall be referred to the joint committee on finance before being passed into law,” according to the State Constitution. 

    Letter to the editor: The best is close to home

    August 31st, 2023

    Because I read this in the County Line, I emailed Jeff and Karyl Lanier, who live in Green Bay and who would be at the Packer game Saturday that Hunter Evenson, the music director at Brookwood, would be singing our National Anthem.

    Letter to the editor: The sneak in Wilton

    August 24th, 2023

    By LINDA BEIER | Wilton I hope the “sneak” in Wilton Is happy with their work As they prowl the streets […]

    Letter to the editor: Van Orden unfit for office

    August 1st, 2023

    Wisconsin Rep. Derrick Van Orden (District 3) has proven that he is unfit for public office.

    Your Right to Know: Records case a win for public accountability

    June 30th, 2023

    When Madison Metropolitan School District communications director Tim LeMonds sued his employer in March to block release of a complaint against him, he claimed there would be grave repercussions if the public were allowed to see the allegations it contained.

  • Letter to the editor: Home schooling, private schools provide better education

    June 30th, 2023

    I feel compelled to respond to Mr. Van Landuyt’s letter regarding public education.

    Letter to the editor: Defunding public schools

    May 17th, 2023

    The well-being and education of every child should be our top priority. Children are our legacy! Older generations retire as youth takes their rightful place in society. They are becoming our leaders and caregivers. 

    Letter to the editor: Empowering rural America

    May 17th, 2023

    Much like the 1930s, when rural people had to create their own path forward to have electricity, we are facing another challenge: the transition to clean energy.

    Your Right to Know: Bill to fix records problem deserves support

    May 16th, 2023

    A unanimous voice vote by the Wisconsin Senate on a piece of legislation is a rare occurrence. But that’s what happened on April 19, when state senators approved a bill to undo a decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court regarding public records.

    Letter to the editor: What is abortion?

    April 20th, 2023

    Ever since the SCOTUS decision to end Roe, discussions of how this affects everyone have been rampant.

    Letter to the editor: Kelly’s win in Monroe County should have been headline

    April 20th, 2023

    I’m disappointed. Nowhere did I see a headline, “Dan Kelly wins Monroe County by large margin.” Which is exactly what happened: Kelly 6,369, Protasiewicz 4,970. If the opposite had happened, I think it would have been big news. Monroe County voters showed they DO value all life from conception to death. 

  • Archives