Your right to know: Judge was wrong to bar recordings of trial

By DAN SHELLEY

Since 1979, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has allowed cameras and microphones in state courtrooms, subject to reasonable restrictions.

Dan Shelley

Thirty years ago, Milwaukee serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer’s sanity trial was broadcast live. In 2006, former Green Bay Packers tight end Mark Chmura’s sexual assault and child enticement trial was broadcast live. This past November, Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial was broadcast live. 

In all these cases, and others, judges in Wisconsin have upheld the public’s right to know by allowing cameras in the courts.

Now, another high-profile murder trial just finished in Madison. But unless you’re one of the very few people who had the time and could find a seat in the Dane County courtroom, you weren’t able to see or hear any of it.

Circuit Court Judge Ellen Berz decided to prohibit any live or recorded broadcast coverage in the trial of Khari Sanford, accused (and ultimately convicted) of killing his then-girlfriend’s parents. Only still photography was allowed. 

In Sanford’s final pre-trial hearing in April, Judge Berz decreed that news outlets were not allowed to broadcast more than one 10-second clip of video or audio, and had to destroy all other recorded video and audio within 24 hours.

In the weeks between Sanford’s pre-trial hearing and the start of his trial, a coalition of groups and media outlets, including the Radio Television Digital News Association, the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association, the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, and a number of  Madison TV stations, petitioned the judge for video and audio during the trial and requested a hearing on the matter.

Berz denied the hearing. She also issued a scathing order banishing video cameras and live audio from the courtroom altogether. The coalition’s attorneys then wrote a respectful letter to Berz’ supervisor, Thomas Vale, the chief judge of Wisconsin’s Fifth Judicial District, asking him to direct Berz to reconsider. 

He refused. 

Now it is doubtful whether video and live audio will be allowed for Sanford’s upcoming sentencing hearing.

This whole case is bad, and not just for the TV stations, radio stations, and other news outlets that wanted to share video and audio from the trial. It’s bad for members of the public, who have been deprived of their right to see how the murder trial was conducted.

Nationally, several recent high-profile murder trials have been broadcast and streamed without any detrimental impact, including the trials of former police officers Kimberly Potter and Derek Chauvin in Minnesota. District Court Judge Peter Cahill, who presided over the Chauvin trial, wrote afterward that the experience convinced him that cameras in the courtroom “can be helpful in promoting trust and confidence in the judicial process and are sometimes necessary to safeguard both the defendant’s right to a public trial and the public’s right of access to criminal trials.”

While Berz’ draconian order in Sanford does not set a legally binding precedent, it sends a strong message to other judges in Wisconsin: forget what the state supreme court said in 1979; if you don’t want cameras, keep them out of your courtroom.

Judges in Wisconsin should weigh Cahill’s point of view over that of Berz — cameras in the courtroom can indeed be helpful in promoting trust and confidence in the judicial process.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Dan Shelley is executive director and chief operating officer of the Radio Television Digital News Association. 

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: Curt Brieske’s community contributions are impressive

    September 22nd, 2022
    by

    On Monday, I attended the funeral of Curt Brieske. There are people in all of our lives who we tend to take for granted, and then when they’re gone, we look back and realize that we did not appreciate him/her enough when we had them.


    Letter to the editor: Censorship is not a game to be played

    September 15th, 2022
    by

    “Books Unite Us, Censorship Divides Us” is this year’s slogan for Banned Books Week (https://bannedbooksweek.org), Sept. 18–24. 


    Letter to the editor: County Line should focus less on Wilton controversy

    September 15th, 2022
    by

    I am an out-of-towner (out of county and state), and I receive my copy of the County Line much later than published. 


    Letter to the editor: Say ‘no’ to Village of Wilton raises

    September 8th, 2022
    by

    As a taxpaying business owner who has two properties in the Village of Wilton (I do not live in the village so I am unable to vote), I urge all village taxpayers to attend the regular board meeting on Monday, Sept. 12, to let your board members know your feelings on the proposed $5/hour wage increase for the full-time village employees.


    Letter to the editor: Wake up, Wilton

    September 8th, 2022
    by

    To the residents and taxpayers of the Village of Wilton:


  • Letter to the editor: How was my summer?

    August 31st, 2022
    by

    Since the summer of 2000 I have looked forward to and enjoyed working at the Wilton Pool. It’s my summer hobby job that refreshes me and refuels me for another year of real work. I love being in that pool space, teaching swimming lessons, mentoring lifeguards, being a face for visitors to the community, swimming and building a multitude of relationships.


    Letter to the editor: Wilton Village Board’s letter to the public omits or skews information

    August 18th, 2022
    by

    By JESSICA BRANDAU | Wilton The following letter was handed out at the Village of Wilton board meeting on Monday […]


    Letter to the editor: Wilton Municipal Pool needs an operating landline phone

    August 18th, 2022
    by

    Lost in all the back and forth regarding the swimming pool is one not-so-minor fact. A fact Nate Beier attempted to make the village board aware of at the July 11 meeting.


    Letter to the editor: Can Wilton bury the hatchet?

    August 3rd, 2022
    by

    My name is Sharon Baldwin. Though I make my home in the country, I have not lived farther than five miles from Wilton in my 60 years of life.


    Letter to the editor: Wilton pool is benefit to the community

    August 3rd, 2022
    by

    Like many people who grew up in Wilton, I have such fond memories of the Wilton Pool from my childhood.


    Letter to the editor: Mighty Wilton has struck out

    August 3rd, 2022
    by

    Mighty Wilton has struck out. I always thought Wilton was run well and had a lot to offer, was a town sought after as a place to live, was a town where people got along. But then every town has issues that all can’t seem to agree on — right now it’s the swimming pool in Wilton.


  • [Advertisement.]
  • [Advertisement.]
  • Archives