Your right to know: Judge was wrong to bar recordings of trial

By DAN SHELLEY

Since 1979, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has allowed cameras and microphones in state courtrooms, subject to reasonable restrictions.

Dan Shelley

Thirty years ago, Milwaukee serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer’s sanity trial was broadcast live. In 2006, former Green Bay Packers tight end Mark Chmura’s sexual assault and child enticement trial was broadcast live. This past November, Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial was broadcast live. 

In all these cases, and others, judges in Wisconsin have upheld the public’s right to know by allowing cameras in the courts.

Now, another high-profile murder trial just finished in Madison. But unless you’re one of the very few people who had the time and could find a seat in the Dane County courtroom, you weren’t able to see or hear any of it.

Circuit Court Judge Ellen Berz decided to prohibit any live or recorded broadcast coverage in the trial of Khari Sanford, accused (and ultimately convicted) of killing his then-girlfriend’s parents. Only still photography was allowed. 

In Sanford’s final pre-trial hearing in April, Judge Berz decreed that news outlets were not allowed to broadcast more than one 10-second clip of video or audio, and had to destroy all other recorded video and audio within 24 hours.

In the weeks between Sanford’s pre-trial hearing and the start of his trial, a coalition of groups and media outlets, including the Radio Television Digital News Association, the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association, the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, and a number of  Madison TV stations, petitioned the judge for video and audio during the trial and requested a hearing on the matter.

Berz denied the hearing. She also issued a scathing order banishing video cameras and live audio from the courtroom altogether. The coalition’s attorneys then wrote a respectful letter to Berz’ supervisor, Thomas Vale, the chief judge of Wisconsin’s Fifth Judicial District, asking him to direct Berz to reconsider. 

He refused. 

Now it is doubtful whether video and live audio will be allowed for Sanford’s upcoming sentencing hearing.

This whole case is bad, and not just for the TV stations, radio stations, and other news outlets that wanted to share video and audio from the trial. It’s bad for members of the public, who have been deprived of their right to see how the murder trial was conducted.

Nationally, several recent high-profile murder trials have been broadcast and streamed without any detrimental impact, including the trials of former police officers Kimberly Potter and Derek Chauvin in Minnesota. District Court Judge Peter Cahill, who presided over the Chauvin trial, wrote afterward that the experience convinced him that cameras in the courtroom “can be helpful in promoting trust and confidence in the judicial process and are sometimes necessary to safeguard both the defendant’s right to a public trial and the public’s right of access to criminal trials.”

While Berz’ draconian order in Sanford does not set a legally binding precedent, it sends a strong message to other judges in Wisconsin: forget what the state supreme court said in 1979; if you don’t want cameras, keep them out of your courtroom.

Judges in Wisconsin should weigh Cahill’s point of view over that of Berz — cameras in the courtroom can indeed be helpful in promoting trust and confidence in the judicial process.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Dan Shelley is executive director and chief operating officer of the Radio Television Digital News Association. 

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: Is Big Brother already listening?

    March 14th, 2024
    by

    By DANI SULIK | Kendall When George Orwell’s novel 1984 was published in 1949, it was seen as a fictional cautionary […]


    Letter to the editor: Vote no on constitutional amendments

    March 14th, 2024
    by

    By JOAN KENT | La Farge Some things are not what they appear. Like the two constitutional amendments on Wisconsin’s April […]


    Letter to the editor: Oath/pledge

    March 14th, 2024
    by

    By LEE D. VAN LANDUYT | Hillsboro An oath is a solemn promise regarding one’s future action or behavior. Our Pledge […]


    Letter to the editor: Questions remain about Vernon County Landfill

    March 11th, 2024
    by

    By CATHY LUND | Viroqua I appreciated the well-articulated article Gail Frie wrote in the paper regarding the landfill. It is […]


    Letter to the editor: Vernon County and Wisconsin are national leaders in landfill safety

    February 8th, 2024
    by

    Recently I became aware of information being circulated in the county through social media and emails that questions the safety of the Vernon County landfill.


  • Your Right to Know: Don’t charge records requesters for redactions

    February 6th, 2024
    by

    You’ve already paid for them. They’re yours. But if you want to see the public records that show what your government is doing, some state lawmakers want you to pay again — this time, for redactions.


    Letter to the editor: Transgender lunacy: Let’s just call it nuts!

    February 5th, 2024
    by

    By BOB BREIDENSTEIN | rural Ontario Nuts! That the latest U.S. Supreme Court justice, at her confirmation hearing, with a bewildered […]


    Letter to the editor: The clock is ticking

    February 5th, 2024
    by

    You’re thinking, “She’s complaining about the Republicans again.” And you’d be right.


    Letter to the editor: Democracy vs. dictatorship

    February 5th, 2024
    by

    Otto von Bismarck once said: “Only a fool learns from his own mistakes. The wise man learns from the mistakes of others.” 


    Letter to the editor: Warm memories and perspectives 

    February 5th, 2024
    by

    Winter meant skating, ice and roller skating. The new pavilion in Ontario has taken the place of the old Ontario Community Hall for skating.


    Letter to the editor: In defense of grammar

    January 4th, 2024
    by

    By DANI SULIK | Kendall Who doesn’t love grammar? Okay, so you may not love it, but you know when it’s […]


  • Archives