Your Right to Know: Here’s to a more transparent 2023


As ever, 2022 was a roller coaster year for open government.  

The Wisconsin Supreme Court made it harder for requesters to recover attorneys’ fees for open records suits, but also issued a ruling to prevent outsiders from blocking responses to open records requests. 

Christa Westerberg

Elections officials struggled under the weight of open records requests in the 2022 election season, but information about the Wisconsin Assembly’s investigation into the 2020 election was finally made public.  

So what can Wisconsin officials do better in 2023? Plenty. 

First, the Wisconsin legislature should pass a fix to the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s opinion in Friends of Frame Park v. City of Waukesha, which set a higher bar for requesters to recover their attorneys fees when they have to sue to get records.  

The Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council issued a statement when the decision was issued, calling it a “body blow to the state’s traditions of open government” and expressing concern that it could deter lawsuits and lead to more delays in providing records.

A conservative law firm, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, agreed. The law firm issued a policy brief proposing different solutions to the decision, including one similar to the fix made by Congress to the federal Freedom of Information Act. We hope the legislature and governor’s office pay attention.

Second, some agencies are experiencing backlogs in providing responses to records requests, in part due to staffing and funding challenges. Agencies should request more funding to fulfill their open records duties in the next budget process, and the legislature should give it to them. Doing so recognizes the open records law’s command that “providing persons with [government] information is declared to be . . . an integral part of the routine duties of officers and employees.”

This includes the Wisconsin Attorney General’s office, charged with enforcing and providing advice to the public about the state’s openness laws, and with fulfilling records requests made to the state Department of Justice. In the runup to the November 2022 election, both attorney general candidates said additional resources would help the office meet its open government obligations. 

Now that the election is settled, Attorney General Josh Kaul should work to make sure these resources are requested, obtained and utilized. He should also consider separating the office’s advice-giving and records-fulfilling functions, so delays in one do not bog down the other.  

Third, local governments, like agencies, can and should work on reducing the time it takes to respond to records requests and reduce or even waive fees for locating and producing records.  To that end, the legislature should take up Gov. Tony Evers’ proposal to raise location fee thresholds from $50 — set in the early 1980s — to $150.

Local governments could also post more records online proactively, and take steps to ensure that exemptions that allow closed meeting sessions are not overused.

All levels of government in Wisconsin should resolve to have a sunny 2023.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (, a group dedicated to open government. Christa Westerberg is the council’s vice president and a partner at the Pines Bach law firm in Madison. 

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: IRS funding should be restored

    February 17th, 2023

    It is absurd that the U.S. House Republican majority chose cutting the IRS as its No. 1 priority and first order of business, as if cutting the IRS reduces spending and government.

    Your Right to Know: Public still paying for fraud probe records fights

    February 17th, 2023

    Many people in Wisconsin are under the impression that the disastrous probe into the state’s 2020 presidential election conducted by former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman is over, as are its costs to taxpayers. They’re wrong.

    Commentary: How are Wisconsin women doing under the 1849 abortion ban?

    January 27th, 2023

    The national Women’s March chose Wisconsin as the location for a massive abortion-rights rally on Sunday, the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, for good reason.

    Letter to the editor: N-O-W referendum — be informed

    January 27th, 2023

    At its Jan. 16 meeting, the Norwalk-Ontario-Wilton School Board passed a motion to proceed with an April referendum to make updates and improvements to the school facilities.

    Letter to the editor: Referendum question on reproductive rights should be Vernon County ballot

    January 27th, 2023

    More than 1,300 Vernon County residents signed a petition requesting that the Vernon County Board place a referendum on the ballot.

  • Letter to the editor: ‘Survivor’ is fascinating story of abortion survivor

    January 27th, 2023

    Jan. 22, 2023, is a special Pro-Life Sunday here in America.

    Letter to the editor: For the record

    January 27th, 2023

    Recently, my opponent came out with her announcement for her candidacy for Vernon County Judge.

    Letter to the editor: Wilton needs new village board members who can rebuild trust

    January 5th, 2023

    It’s been roughly six months since our debacle with the Wilton Pool started. 

    Letter to the editor: Wilton community Christmas party should be an annual event

    December 22nd, 2022

    I attended the Wilton community Christmas party Saturday night at the community center, sponsored by the Wilton Public Library and assisted by organizations in the Wilton community. 

    Letter to the editor: Support healthcare reform

    December 16th, 2022

    Congratulations to Rep. Loren Oldenburg upon his reelection to the Wisconsin State Assembly. I am grateful for each of the 10,467 votes I received in this election and for every dollar donated to my campaign.

    Your Right to Know: Prehn records fight seeks accountability

    December 5th, 2022

    More than a year and a half after the expiration of his term, Dr. Frederick Prehn continues to occupy a seat on the Natural Resources Board, which sets policy for the state Department of Natural Resources. His refusal to step down has allowed him to cast the deciding vote in key decisions related to wildlife management, PFAS water quality standards, and land acquisition, with other important issues on the horizon.

  • [Advertisement.]
  • Archives