Your right to know: Supreme Court openness rulings a mixed bag

April Barker

By APRIL BARKER

As befits a year in which anything, it seems, can happen, the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s public records docket this term was marked by atypical cases.

In Voces de la Frontera v. Clarke, the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Department redacted information from immigration detainer forms provided in response to public records requests, asserting that a federal immigration regulation required the redactions. A Milwaukee County judge and the Wisconsin Court of Appeals concluded that federal law did not require the redactions, but the Supreme Court disagreed.

Open government advocates were disappointed that the Supreme Court’s opinion focused almost exclusively on this interpretation of federal law, not the presumptions of openness enshrined in Wisconsin statutes.

In Teague v. Schimel, the court looked at whether the Wisconsin Department of Justice violated individuals’ rights by releasing background check materials that sometimes reflected the criminal records of other individuals with the same names and birth dates or that had been used as aliases.

Those besmirched by the offenses of others argued that lives were negatively affected as a result.

The Supreme Court agreed that Teague had reason to complain that his cousin’s record was released as his. Openness advocates anticipate the ruling will not have a broad impact, because the issues it raised had less to do with transparency in government than allegations that government failed to correct defects in its process.

In Democratic Party of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Justice, the court ruled that the Department of Justice does not have to release videos of training sessions that it argued would give away sensitive information about law enforcement techniques.

This decision especially disappointed open government advocates because of majority author Justice Rebecca Bradley’s suggestion that the partisan motivation of the requester could be taken into account, contrary to how the law has previously been interpreted. Already, this argument has been invoked in other cases.

In Krueger v. Appleton Area School District, the court determined that a school committee formed to review course materials was a “governmental body” subject to the Wisconsin open meetings law, rejecting arguments to the contrary. It was a major win for openness and accountability.

And then court took a big step backward when it decided to close its own administrative rule meetings, which had previously been public. This result was unexpected and, to open government advocates, dismaying.

In its upcoming term, the court has agreed to hear Madison Teachers Union v. Scott, which stems from a union’s request for state records regarding which members had voted during a union recertification vote. The request was denied on grounds that the union would coerce and intimidate employees during the voting process.

The state Department of Justice cited Justice Bradley’s opinion regarding a requester’s motivation in a brief defending this denial.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (www.wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. April Barker is the group’s co-vice president. The group filed friend of the court briefs in the cases involving Sheriff Clarke and the Appleton Area School District.



Comments are closed.

  • National Health Center Week celebrates the key to healthier communities

    August 17th, 2017
    by

    National Health Center Week celebrates the key to healthier communities Submitted by Scenic Bluffs Community Health Centers For more than 50 years, Community Health Centers have delivered affordable, accessible, quality and


    Letter to the editor: Thank you to those who helped with Norwalk Fire Department tournament

    August 17th, 2017
    by

    The Norwalk Fire Department, after nine months of planning for its fund-raising ball tournament, was disappointed by Mother Nature when it left Norwalk’s ball field in shambles.


    Monroe County Sheriff’s Office: ‘Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over’ campaign starts Aug. 18

    August 17th, 2017
    by

    Whether the cause is alcohol, prescription medication or other drugs, driving impaired endangers everyone traveling along our roadways.


    Editorial cartoon

    August 16th, 2017
    by

    […]


    Editorial cartoon

    July 27th, 2017
    by

    […]


  • Facebook




  • Letter to the editor: Thank you to those who helped in last week’s storm and aftermath

    July 27th, 2017
    by

    I want to give a big shout out to Joe Degenhardt, Jeff Buchholz and Damian Dinger for the help they gave to me and so many others during last week’s storm and its aftermath.


    Book review: ‘Washington’s Farewell’ by John Avlon

    July 13th, 2017
    by

    At the end of Washington’s second term as the first President of the United States, he caused his farewell address to be printed in a neutral newspaper “for the people.”


    Letter to the editor: WDRT is one of community’s greatest assets

    July 13th, 2017
    by

    Community is a dynamic and living experience. Learning about and from one another is essential and fun.


    Your Right to Know: End lawmakers’ ability to destroy records

    July 13th, 2017
    by

    Not long ago, I asked Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) for records regarding a controversial bill he helped author on free-speech rights at state universities.


    Editorial cartoon

    July 13th, 2017
    by

    […]


    Editorial cartoon

    July 13th, 2017
    by

    […]





  • Local Weather

  • [Advertisement.]
  • Latest

    Wilton students, 1956

    This 1956 photo is thought to depict Wilton first-graders going on a hobo hike.

    Norwalk’s tractor-pull weekend

    The Norwalk Lions Club hosted its annual truck and tractor pull last weekend.

    Royall presents ‘Urinetown’

    Last weekend Royall High School students presented “Urinetown,” a satirical musical comedy that addresses such subjects as the legal system, capitalism, and social irresponsibility.

  • [Advertisement.]
  • [Advertisement.]
  • Archives