Your Right to Know: Public still paying for fraud probe records fights

By BILL LUEDERS

Many people in Wisconsin are under the impression that the disastrous probe into the state’s 2020 presidential election conducted by former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman is over, as are its costs to taxpayers. They’re wrong.

Bill Lueders

The probe, conducted over 14 months by Gableman at the behest of Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, failed to find any evidence of significant fraud. It did, however, reveal ample evidence of incompetence on the part of Gableman and his team, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), including multiple spelling errors. It also led to contempt charges against both Vos and Gableman, and to a judge’s referral of Gableman to the office that regulates attorney conduct for his disgraceful behavior during a court proceeding.

Vos, whose name the OSC routinely rendered as “Voss,” fired Gableman last August, after relations between the two had soured to where Gableman endorsed the speaker’s GOP primary opponent. At the time, the cost of the probe and associated records battles was tallied at more than $1.1 million, all paid for with taxpayer dollars. Remarked state Sen. Melissa Agard (D-Madison): “I’m glad that Speaker Vos has stopped the bleeding for these tax dollars going to a sham investigation.”

In fact, the bleeding never stopped. The amount paid by taxpayers now stands at more than $2 million, including nearly $1.5 million in legal fees, according to a report by WisPolitics.com; it could yet rise by hundreds of thousands more. That’s in part because Vos and attorneys for OSC are continuing to drag out litigation over the four records-related lawsuits brought by American Oversight, a liberal watchdog group.

One case, involving contractors’ records controlled by Vos, awaits resolution on various issues, including whether American Oversight can recover its in-house counsel fees. Vos is arguing, against logic and history, that attorneys who work for a group bringing a fight cannot recover their fees. A second case, involving records in Vos’ own files, is being briefed in the circuit court on attorneys’ fees, which Vos is contending are too high, though they are well within the norm. 

third case, in which a judge ruled in American Oversight’s favor and awarded it $197,510 in attorneys’ fees, is being appealed over every aspect, including attorneys’ fees and a contempt finding against the OSC. The group’s attorney, Jim Bopp, received permission from the court to file a 35,000-word brief, more than three times the usual limit. In this case, according to WisPolitics.com, “Assembly Republicans have already spent more fighting a judge’s order that they cover legal fees for American Oversight than the $197,510 taxpayers are currently on the hook to pay.”

fourth case, regarding preservation of OSC records, remains pending.

In all of these legal challenges, taxpayers are footing the bill for the outside counsel; if American Oversight prevails, which I think is likely, taxpayers will also have to cover the group’s legal costs.   

“All of this could have been avoided if Speaker Vos and OSC had simply followed the law” by preserving and providing records of their investigation, says Heather Sawyer, executive director at American Oversight.

Enough already. It’s time for Vos and the Legislature to truly turn off the spigot of tax dollars flowing into this ill-begotten cause.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Bill Lueders is the council’s president.

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: Vote yes for N-O-W referendum

    21 hours ago
    by

    NOW. What a coincidence our school district’s acronym is NOW, for truly NOW is the time to secure our future not only for our students, but also for rural communities and villages alike. 


    Letter to the editor: Palmer Fisher is best choice for judge

    21 hours ago
    by

    Angela Palmer Fisher is running for Vernon County Judge in the upcoming April 4 election.


    Letter to the editor Protasiewicz not an ‘extreme partisan’

    21 hours ago
    by

    The April 4 election between Janet Protasiewicz (Pro-tas-see-witz) and Dan Kelly for a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat will determine the future of the Court, and Wisconsin itself, for at least 10 years (the term length for a justice).


    Letter to the editor: Gaskell has great judgment, common sense

    21 hours ago
    by

    In the 21 years I spent on the bench as a Circuit Court Judge in La Crosse County, I had the pleasure of having Attorney Tim Gaskell appear before me many times.


    Letter to the editor: Support Dan Kelly

    21 hours ago
    by

    I write this to encourage voters to support Dan Kelly in the state Supreme Court election on April 4.


  • Letter to the editor: Vote against Judge Janet

    21 hours ago
    by

    We now have one of the most important elections we have ever had in our state.


    Letter to the editor: WAKE? WOKE? WOKEN?

    21 hours ago
    by

    The now generally accepted use of the term WOKE in society bothers me as a linguist.


    Letter to the editor: IRS funding should be restored

    February 17th, 2023
    by

    It is absurd that the U.S. House Republican majority chose cutting the IRS as its No. 1 priority and first order of business, as if cutting the IRS reduces spending and government.


    Commentary: How are Wisconsin women doing under the 1849 abortion ban?

    January 27th, 2023
    by

    The national Women’s March chose Wisconsin as the location for a massive abortion-rights rally on Sunday, the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, for good reason.


    Letter to the editor: N-O-W referendum — be informed

    January 27th, 2023
    by

    At its Jan. 16 meeting, the Norwalk-Ontario-Wilton School Board passed a motion to proceed with an April referendum to make updates and improvements to the school facilities.


    Letter to the editor: Referendum question on reproductive rights should be Vernon County ballot

    January 27th, 2023
    by

    More than 1,300 Vernon County residents signed a petition requesting that the Vernon County Board place a referendum on the ballot.


  • [Advertisement.]
  • Archives