Your right to know: Policies put public health at risk

Christa Westerberg

By CHRISTA WESTERBERG

Wisconsin’s open government laws were meant to strengthen our democracy by ensuring an informed electorate. But, sometimes, transparency is about more than democracy — it is about human health, with serious consequences when transparency fails.

Earlier this year, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that the city of Milwaukee had failed to alert thousands of families whose children had blood tests indicating elevated lead levels. Lead from water pipes and old paint is a significant public health risk in Milwaukee and elsewhere, causing cognitive damage and other problems.

It later emerged that officials in Milwaukee had imposed a gag order on health department employees. It barred them from having contacts with elected officials without prior approval. Said one alder, “This policy is a disgrace and it likely restricted workers from coming forward sooner.” The policy has since been rescinded.

Sometimes, requests for health information and data are simply stonewalled, for no good reason. The Milwaukee Public School district failed to respond for weeks to questions about whether it tested drinking water fountains for lead. It later reported that 183 fountains had high lead levels.

And when La Crosse County learned about high levels of nitrate in drinking water wells near a large hog operation, it worked for months to get groundwater data from the Department of Natural Resources. Eventually, the county had to file open records requests, which took months to fulfill.

“If the state is keeping data on groundwater, why isn’t it sharing it willingly with its own counties, its own people, in the spirit of public health?” asked the La Crosse Tribune in an exasperated editorial. “County health officials shouldn’t be required to become experts on public-records law in order to find out whether there’s a health hazard in their own county.”

The DNR also came under fire last year for “muzzling” its scientists, preventing them from providing expert input on natural resource and other issues. Since 2011, DNR employees do not regularly testify at legislative hearings on matters within the agency’s purview.

Last year, a DNR scientist had to testify on his own time at a legislative hearing to roll back air-pollution standards. Other legislation, like a bill changing rules for managing chronic wasting disease in the state’s deer herd, had no DNR input at all.

Many public employees take seriously their duty to inform decision-makers and the public about ways to prevent health problems and lower risk. Yet some are unjustly penalized for reporting problems and sharing information. Multiple workers at the Veterans Administration hospital in Tomah, Wisconsin, were retaliated against for reporting the over-prescription of opioids and other problems.

Government agencies should always be cognizant of their duties under transparency laws. But these duties gain extra import when government holds information that can help protect public health and safety.

Taxpayers pay for the expertise of government scientists and the data they collect and generate. While some discretion may be warranted in how it is released, this information should be accessible to the public. No gag order, stonewall, or muzzle should prevent that.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (www.wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Christa Westerberg, an attorney at Pines Bach law firm in Madison, is the group’s co-vice president.

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: Former Town of Glendale patrolman’s health is good

    May 9th, 2019
    by

    I’d like to express my thanks to the many of you who have contacted me regarding my health and my employment with the township.


    Letter to the editor: Why are trees, brush being removed from along creeks?

    May 9th, 2019
    by

    I would like to voice my concerns as to what’s going on with the pulling out of trees and brush along our creeks.


    Letter to the editor: Enjoy the easy lifestyle in Ontario

    May 9th, 2019
    by

    Sunday was a nice day. My oldest daughter took me to a very distinctive bar in Ontario.


    Editorial cartoon

    May 9th, 2019
    by

    […]


    Ontario chief initiates food-drive challenge with Norwalk, Wilton police departments

    May 7th, 2019
    by

    When I returned to the Village of Ontario as the Peace Officer, I was pleasantly informed of the food pantry at Norwalk-Ontario-Wilton Schools.


  • Editorial cartoon

    May 2nd, 2019
    by

    […]


    Your right to know: Body cam bill balances privacy, openness

    May 2nd, 2019
    by

    When so much about politics is partisan, one might expect a topic like police body cameras to be contentious, particularly as it relates to public access to recordings.


    Letter to the editor: Support appreciated for Wilton food pantry

    May 2nd, 2019
    by

    St. Paul’s Food Pantry continues to serve many needy families in the Wilton area. Over the last two years, we have had more than 60 different families visit the pantry, and about 30 of these families use it regularly. 


    Letter to the editor: A nation of sheep

    May 2nd, 2019
    by

    “A Nation of Sheep,” authored by William Lederer, was published in 1961. Its purpose was to shed light on and discuss the effects of the apathy and ignorance of the American people at that time.


    Letter to the editor: Republican confusion

    May 2nd, 2019
    by

    “It’s my party and I’ll cry if I want to” are words from a pop song of the 1960s. It may become the Republican theme song.


    Letter to the editor: Choice: Populism or compassionate socialism

    April 25th, 2019
    by

    I never thought people of Wisconsin would even have thought about electing a party that called itself socialist Democrats.


  • Facebook

  • [Advertisement.]
  • Archives