Your right to know: Policies put public health at risk

Christa Westerberg

By CHRISTA WESTERBERG

Wisconsin’s open government laws were meant to strengthen our democracy by ensuring an informed electorate. But, sometimes, transparency is about more than democracy — it is about human health, with serious consequences when transparency fails.

Earlier this year, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that the city of Milwaukee had failed to alert thousands of families whose children had blood tests indicating elevated lead levels. Lead from water pipes and old paint is a significant public health risk in Milwaukee and elsewhere, causing cognitive damage and other problems.

It later emerged that officials in Milwaukee had imposed a gag order on health department employees. It barred them from having contacts with elected officials without prior approval. Said one alder, “This policy is a disgrace and it likely restricted workers from coming forward sooner.” The policy has since been rescinded.

Sometimes, requests for health information and data are simply stonewalled, for no good reason. The Milwaukee Public School district failed to respond for weeks to questions about whether it tested drinking water fountains for lead. It later reported that 183 fountains had high lead levels.

And when La Crosse County learned about high levels of nitrate in drinking water wells near a large hog operation, it worked for months to get groundwater data from the Department of Natural Resources. Eventually, the county had to file open records requests, which took months to fulfill.

“If the state is keeping data on groundwater, why isn’t it sharing it willingly with its own counties, its own people, in the spirit of public health?” asked the La Crosse Tribune in an exasperated editorial. “County health officials shouldn’t be required to become experts on public-records law in order to find out whether there’s a health hazard in their own county.”

The DNR also came under fire last year for “muzzling” its scientists, preventing them from providing expert input on natural resource and other issues. Since 2011, DNR employees do not regularly testify at legislative hearings on matters within the agency’s purview.

Last year, a DNR scientist had to testify on his own time at a legislative hearing to roll back air-pollution standards. Other legislation, like a bill changing rules for managing chronic wasting disease in the state’s deer herd, had no DNR input at all.

Many public employees take seriously their duty to inform decision-makers and the public about ways to prevent health problems and lower risk. Yet some are unjustly penalized for reporting problems and sharing information. Multiple workers at the Veterans Administration hospital in Tomah, Wisconsin, were retaliated against for reporting the over-prescription of opioids and other problems.

Government agencies should always be cognizant of their duties under transparency laws. But these duties gain extra import when government holds information that can help protect public health and safety.

Taxpayers pay for the expertise of government scientists and the data they collect and generate. While some discretion may be warranted in how it is released, this information should be accessible to the public. No gag order, stonewall, or muzzle should prevent that.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (www.wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Christa Westerberg, an attorney at Pines Bach law firm in Madison, is the group’s co-vice president.

Comments are closed.

  • Your right to know: Records fees mean records denials

    February 13th, 2020
    by

    As founder of We the Irrelevant, a website that tracks how well (or poorly) the actions of legislators match up with what the public has asked them to do,


    Letter to the editor: Impeachment and Black History Month highlight Republican sexism and racism

    February 13th, 2020
    by

    Aside from the corruption of the Republican Party, the impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump highlighted the party’s racism and sexism, with one notable exception.


    Letter to the editor: Thirty pieces of silver

    February 13th, 2020
    by

    Truth reflects fact and reality. Lasting relationships depend on truth. Persons of faith should recognize truth as the cornerstone of their belief system.


    Editorial cartoon

    February 13th, 2020
    by

    Editorial cartoon

    January 20th, 2020
    by

  • Letter to the editor: We should be proud, but what’s changed?

    January 16th, 2020
    by

    I am very proud of the good people of our community who care for the needy.


    Your right to know: Pollution records must be open

    January 9th, 2020
    by

    Just shy of two years ago, this column explored the heightened importance of open government when public health is at risk.


    Twomey: Purchasing flood insurance has many benefits

    January 9th, 2020
    by

    Matt Gabrielson, writing in the La Farge Episcope, advised that it was “never too early to be thinking about flooding.” His weather and climate page are essential reading in that newspaper.


    Letter to the editor: Looking for new people on the Norwalk Village Board

    January 9th, 2020
    by

    Here we are; it is caucus time already. Where did the year go? It would be great to see another good turnout like last year.


    Letter to the editor: Trump starts war to save his presidency

    January 9th, 2020
    by

    In November 2017, I sent a letter to the County Line predicting that if President Donald Trump was threatened with impeachment, he would start a war with North Korea to distract Americans.


    Letter to the editor: Texas shooting has stirred up gun debate

    January 9th, 2020
    by

    The recent shooting in a Texas church has stirred up the gun debate.


  • Archives