Your right to know: Don’t chip away at records access

Bill Lueders

By BILL LUEDERS

One great thing about Wisconsin’s open records law is that it’s not supposed to matter who wants records or why.

The law, enacted in 1983, asserts that no state or local government office may deny a request because the person making it “is unwilling to be identified or to state the purpose of the request.”

This is an important principle, because access to public information should not be limited to people whose motives have been deemed pure. In fact, citizens and political parties often use the law to scrutinize public officials and political opponents. That’s how it should be.

A few years back, the primary author of Wisconsin’s open records law, former state Sen. Lynn Adelman, now a federal judge, told a group of open government advocates that he was prepared to kill the entire bill rather than accept an amendment that would have removed this ability to make anonymous requests. Public records, he felt, needed to be public to all.

Over the years, this ideal has sustained damage. In 1996, the state Legislature limited the ability of incarcerated persons to make records requests. In 2005, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that an alleged sexual harasser could be denied access to unredacted records regarding complaints against him. In 2014, a state appeals court backed up a school district that refused to provide records regarding one of its employees to a man with a history of violence against her.

These are tough cases; inmates, harassers and abusers are not sympathetic figures. But we must be careful about denying access to records based on who is asking.

In late 2016, the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld a state agency’s decision to deny a request for training videos, ostensibly to protect sensitive law enforcement techniques. The decision’s author, Justice Rebecca Bradley, noted in passing that the records requester, the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, had a “partisan purpose” in making its request.

That’s troubling, because the requester’s purpose shouldn’t matter — and, it can be argued, still does not, despite Bradley’s careless wording. If Democrats can be denied access because they are partisan, so can Republicans. Or anyone.

Earlier this year, the state Supreme Court ruled against a labor union that sought records to help secure votes in a recertification election. The court’s conservative majority accepted arguments, unsubstantiated by any evidence, that the union might use these records to harass. Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, writing in dissent, called this a “concocted concern.”

This case involved a particular set of circumstances, and its reach should not apply to other requests. But we must remain wary about taking any requester’s identity or motives into account. That provides a too-easy out for officials looking for excuses to keep public information under wraps.

To quote from the law, “All persons are entitled to the greatest possible information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts of those officers and employees who represent them.” All persons — not just those the government likes.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (www.wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Bill Lueders, managing editor of The Progressive, is the group’s president.

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: Little towns still have heart despite floods

    March 14th, 2019
    by

    Little towns are still the best. I needed my car started, as it had set too long without me running it.


    Letter to the editor: Vote for Brian Hagedorn for Wisconsin Supreme Court

    March 14th, 2019
    by

    April’s spring election is right around the corner and more important than most people realize. Madison liberals are aiming to tip the balance of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.


    Letter to the editor: If investigated, Clinton would be in electric chair

    March 7th, 2019
    by

    I have to laugh at the diligence they are giving to the Donald Trump investigation.


    Letter to the editor: Forward Ontario

    March 7th, 2019
    by

    Our community will work with an area artist to create a mural that will be placed on the side of the municipal building on the hill that faces the intersection of Highway 131 and Highway 33.


    Letter to the editor: All judges show bias

    March 7th, 2019
    by

    A tsunami of laughter swept across Wisconsin in January 2019 in response to Brian Hagedorn’s announcement that he is a candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.


  • Letter to the editor: President has encouraged toxic atmosphere

    March 7th, 2019
    by

    FBI data released last year: Hate crimes are up 17 percent in 2017 over 2016, the third consecutive annual rise.


    Letter to the editor: Our drinking water is at risk

    March 7th, 2019
    by

    Without water, there can be no life! Without clean drinking water, we are dust.


    Letter to the editor: Background on Ho-Chunk funds

    February 21st, 2019
    by

    In reference to the Feb. 7 edition of the County Line regarding the funds from the Ho-Chunk Nation.


    Editorial cartoon

    February 21st, 2019
    by

    […]


    Your right to know: Obey law on public employee records

    February 7th, 2019
    by

    The behavior of public employees on the job is subject to public scrutiny in nearly every circumstance under Wisconsin law.


    Letter to the editor: New generations, please grab the torch

    February 7th, 2019
    by

    Much appreciated the Jan. 31 BackTalk. Brilliant! I hope a student goes for it and has lots of classmates and parents to back her up.


  • Facebook

  • [Advertisement.]
  • Archives