Your right to know: Records fees mean records denials

Sheila Plotkin

By SHEILA PLOTKIN
As founder of We the Irrelevant, a website that tracks how well (or poorly) the actions of legislators match up with what the public has asked them to do, I have sent multiple open records requests to Wisconsin legislators on a variety of controversial initiatives. Each time, I’ve asked them for related citizen correspondence. 

I included Gov. Tony Evers in my most recent request. He has been criticized for a lack of openness, but I’m pleased to report that I promptly received relevant electronic records from his office in response to my November 11, 2019, open records request related to the special session on gun law reform. To date, 124 legislators have also provided records. Only one has asked me to pay a fee.

Rep. Jim Steineke (R-Kaukauna) demanded $139.45 for the electronic records in his custody. I asked him to waive the fees, as every one of his colleagues had done. He refused to do so. I refused to pay. 

In my email to Rep. Steineke, I told him: “I am not a law firm or a media outlet or a corporation. I am a senior citizen on a fixed income asking for public records in the public interest. I am not able to pay for my access to those records.” He was not moved. My access was denied.

I queried members of the Joint Finance Committee regarding Gov. Evers’ education budget in May 2019. Committee co-chair Rep. John Nygren (R-Marinette) wanted $100.41 for the electronic records in his custody. No other member of the committee asked for money to fulfill this request. I refused to pay. The records remain in his custody.

In 1981, the Legislature wrote location and retrieval fees into the open records law, saying that costs over $50 could be assigned to the requestor. According to this inflation calculator, that $50 is now $140.56. Lawmakers need to raise this $50 cap, just as they have evolved from using paper to using electronic records. They also need to make choices that serve the public interest.

This sentence appears on page 69 of the 2018 Open Records Law Compliance Manual, produced by the Wisconsin Justice Department: “An authority has discretion to provide requested records for free or at a reduced charge.” From my perspective, “discretion” is the key word here.

Since We the Irrelevant was born in December 2015, most legislators I’ve queried have chosen not to levy charges, even when hundreds of pages had to be printed. Now that the Court of Appeals has ruled that electronic records must be provided upon request, costs have been significantly reduced. Yet Steineke and Nygren still choose to charge. Why?

The Declaration of Purpose, which begins the state’s public records law, could hardly be clearer:

“It is declared to be the public policy of this state that all persons are entitled to the greatest possible information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts of those officers and employees who represent them,” it states. “To that end, (this statute) shall be construed in every instance with a presumption of complete public access ….”

Unreasonable and undocumented charges don’t promote complete public access. They obstruct it. I wonder at the motivation of those public officials whose choices price the public out of the open records market.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Sheila Plotkin is a retired Milwaukee teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing who now lives in Madison.

Comments are closed.

  • Letter to the editor: Thank you, N-O-W School District

    July 1st, 2020
    by

    As my last day as the Superintendent of the Norwalk-Ontario-Wilton School District has passed,I wanted to take a few moments to say “Thank You” to the Norwalk-Ontario-Wilton School District.


    Editorial cartoon

    June 24th, 2020
    by

    Letter to the editor: We must take care of people who struggle

    June 24th, 2020
    by

    You wrote an excellent Back Talk regarding the militaristic interventions at the George Floyd protests and the Depression-era veterans’ protest over non-receipt of their bonus checks.


    Letter to the editor: Do black lives really matter to Black Lives Matter?

    June 24th, 2020
    by

    I am sorry; I just don’t get it.


    Letter to the editor: Trump’s narcissism, lies and gullible evangelicals

    June 24th, 2020
    by

    President Donald Trump’s grossly inflated opinion of himself was never more apparent than at his June 20 rally in Tulsa, Okla.


  • Editorial cartoon

    June 18th, 2020
    by

    Your right to know: Keeping an eye on government from home

    June 18th, 2020
    by

    In March, as Wisconsin enacted Safer at Home, state and local governments scrambled to build new ways to govern from remote locations while still complying with our open meeting laws.


    Letter to the editor: Wisconsin law enforcement officer training, policies, and state laws

    June 18th, 2020
    by

    The Badger State Sheriffs’ Association represents 72 Wisconsin sheriffs, and the Wisconsin Chiefs of Police Association represents 425 police chiefs in the state of Wisconsin.


    Letter to the editor: R.I.P. — G.O.P.

    June 18th, 2020
    by

    The Republican Party began in Ripon, Wis., on March 20, 1854. It primarily opposed slavery.


    Editorial cartoon

    June 3rd, 2020
    by

    Letter to the editor: America has to face inequality, inequity

    June 2nd, 2020
    by

    I’m staying in Madison for the night, and Mom just called to check in on me: she heard about the riots and wanted to make sure I was okay.


  • Archives